Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
Last Updated: 21.06.2025 01:29
For some atheists, however, the argument is convincing.
Existence of evil => God doesn’t exist
A rational person can easily refute a flat-earther argument that the surface of the Earth is not curved. For a flat-earther, however, his (or her) argument against a curved earth, is convincing.
How will the article end in Part III of Gleissner's hit piece?
They bring up the argument because they find it convincing.
Similarly, a religious person can easily refute the argument
Question: Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?